Evaluating sources and information includes an evaluation of the author or creator.
Always ask yourself: Who do you trust? Who do you believe? Why?
When deciding on whether to spend your time on an information source or resource you should consider:
Information resources reflect their creators’ expertise and credibility, and need to be evaluated based on the information need and the context in which the information will be used.
This is summarized in the statement: Authority is constructed and contextual.
"Authority is constructed" means that authority is built on the experience, knowledge, and reputation of the author. Authority standards vary by communities who may recognize different types of authority.
"Authority is contextual" means that the context of your information need will determine the level of authority required.
Some guidelines and considerations when considering the authority of an author or information creator:
"Authority Is Constructed and Contextual" is the Association of College & Research Libraries' (ACRL) Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education's first frame. The above explanation was based on and modified from the text of the frame.
Authors for the books in April's Featured Book display and in this research guide were evaluated for their authority, emphasizing the criteria of scholarly and professional expertise.
They include professors at well-regarded academic institutions, journalists at highly regarded publications, and some from the world of politics.
Several are currently writing or podcasting on these topics in online spaces. Below is a list of the authors with links to their online publications or more recent activity.
Scholarship is Conversation, after all.
The authors with hyperlinks below link to the author's Substack or podcast. (For the Substack pages, click on "Continue Reading" or "No Thanks" to get to the page without subscribing.)
Authors without current writing posted online do not have links, but a little bio is included.